Table 4b Comparison of RPC density and PRNFL thickness between the two subgroups of patients
From: Macular microvasculature in patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy: a cross-sectional study
Patients with CAS ≥ 3, Mean ± SD | Patients with CAS < 3, Mean ± SD | P-Value [95% Confidence Interval of the Difference] | |
|---|---|---|---|
PRNFL thickness (µm) | 96.22 ± 19.37 | 105.50 ± 21.85 | 0.110 [-1.94, 20.50] |
Whole image RPC density (%) | 43.13 ± 5.76 | 44.83 ± 8.14 | 0.395 [-2.27, 5.67] |
Whole image RPC density-superior hemisphere | 42.78 ± 5.78 | 44.26 ± 8.27 | 0.459 [-2.53, 5.57] |
Whole image RPC density-inferior hemisphere | 43.44 ± 6.11 | 45.40 ± 8.13 | 0.333 [-1.89, 5.82] |