Open Access

Radioiodine thyroid remnant ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC): prospective comparison of long-term outcomes of treatment with 30, 60 and 100 mCi

  • Aleksandra Kukulska1Email author,
  • Jolanta Krajewska1,
  • Marzena Gawkowska-Suwińska1,
  • Zbigniew Puch1,
  • Ewa Paliczka-Cieslik1,
  • Jozef Roskosz1,
  • Daria Handkiewicz-Junak1,
  • Michał Jarzab1,
  • Elzbieta Gubała1 and
  • Barbara Jarzab1
Thyroid Research20103:9

DOI: 10.1186/1756-6614-3-9

Received: 24 August 2010

Accepted: 1 November 2010

Published: 1 November 2010

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 131I therapy between three groups of DTC patients who received 30, 60 or 100 mCi for thyroid remnant ablation after total thyroidectomy and were postoperatively judged with low risk of cancer recurrence.

Methods

The project was designed as a two-stage, prospective randomized clinical trial. In 1998-2001 in a randomized prospective study the early comparison of treatment with 30 mCi vs 60 mCi suggested the lower 131I activity to be less effective, whereas in 2003-2005 the comparison between 60 vs 100 mCi showed no significant differences. The present study comprises the long-term assessment of the disease course in 3 study groups.

Results

A group of 309 DTC patients (285 women and 24 men) with no clinical, histopathological, sonographical or biochemical signs of persistent disease were included after total thyroidectomy and appropriate extent of neck lymph node dissection (265 with papillary and 44 with follicular thyroid cancer). For radioiodine thyroid remnant ablation, 30 mCi of 131I was applied in 86 patients, whereas 60 mCi in 128 and 100 mCi in 95 patients. The median follow-up was 10 years (2-12) for subjects treated with 30 mCi and 60 mCi and 6 years (2-6) for patients treated with 100 mCi of 131I. In the first evaluation, published previously, we observed that because of incomplete thyroid remnant ablation, the second 131I treatment was necessary in 10% patients, without difference between groups treated with 60 and 100 mCi and in 22% patients treated with 30 mCi. All patients entered full remission. To evaluate the long-term outcome of the adjuvant 131I treatment, the course of the follow-up and the most recent disease status were assessed by sonography, radiological examinations and serum Tg estimation (on LT4-suppressive treatment). Within the whole observation period local relapse was stated in 2 (2.4%), 4 (3%) and 3 (3%) patients treated with 131I activities of 30 mCi, 60 mCi and 100 mCi respectively and serum Tg concentration on LT4-suppressive treatment was low, without differences between groups.

Conclusions

No significant differences in the 5 years efficacy of thyroid remnant radioiodine ablation using 30, 60 and 100 mCi were observed in low-risk DTC patients operated by total thyroidectomy and neck lymph node dissection. However, patients treated initially with 30 mCi, required second course of radioiodine in 22%, while this was necessary only in 13,3% and 11,2% of patients treated with 60 mCi and 100 mCi respectively.

Introduction

Postoperative complementary radioiodine (131I) therapy is the standard treatment for differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). One aim of this therapy is to destroy thyroid remnant to remove their competition with cancer cells for secretion of thyroglobulin or 131I uptake. Thus, the name of thyroid remnant ablation is used. The second aim is to treat putative cancer micrometastases. Only the adjuvant 131I therapy enables the detection of functional micrometastases, which are visible during the post-therapeutic total body scan, but not on X-ray or CT images [1]. Therefore it is important to ensure, both for the healthy follicular cells and thyroid cancer cells to absorb appropriately high radiation doses. The absorbed dose depend, among others, on the ability of the cells to trap and cumulate 131I. The capability of thyroid cancer cells is much lower than of the healthy ones so the 131I activity sufficient for thyroid remnant ablation might not be sufficient to treat cancer micrometastases. That is why the evaluation of the effectiveness of the adjuvant 131I therapy must include the assessment of thyroid remnant ablation effectiveness as well as of micrometastases treatment. The latter can be done only by the long-term disease follow-up.

Usually, most DTC recurrences are diagnosed within first 5 years postoperatively. Adjuvant 131I treatment increases specificity of the further serum thyroglobulin follow-up, as in patients operated because of differentiated thyroid carcinoma but not treated by 131I the source of Tg might be both healthy thyroid cells and cancer cells. After successful thyroid remnant ablation thyroglobulin may be secreted by only cancer cells. Also the adjuvant therapy improves the sensitivity and specificity of the further DTC 131I-based diagnostic by abolishing the competition amongst healthy follicular cells and cancer cells to uptake the 131I.

For patients with differentiated thyroid cancer various therapeutic activities are used to carry out the adjuvant 131I treatment: from 30 to 200 mCi (1,1 - 7,4 GBq) [27]. The most favorable activity has not been established yet although a great deal of research has been performed. Early papers evaluating the efficiency of the adjuvant 131I treatment mainly focused on its thyroid ablation role and were rather observational. They did not prove any relation between therapeutic activity and ablation effectiveness. In 1996, Bal et al. carried out a prospective randomized clinical trial in which they evaluated the effectiveness of some activities. Then divided the patients into four groups which were administered respectively: 25-34 mCi, 35-64 mCi, 65-119 mCi and finally 120-200 mCi. They concluded that 50 mCi was the most effective activity and that an increase in activity did not bring about any therapeutic benefits. Mazaferri compared retrospectively the outcome in 1,004 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, whose median follow-up time was on average 15 years, however, did not indicate the optimal dose of 131I necessary to achieve the best therapeutic effect. The prospective randomized study published in 2008 by Mäenpää et al. evaluated the effectiveness of the thyroid remnant ablation and long-term results of adjuvant 131I therapy and did not prove the treatment with 100 mCi being better than 30 mCi [6]. Thus, we decided to perform own prospective study. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of adjuvant 131I therapy between three groups of DTC patients who were treated by total thyroidectomy and lymph neck dissection and evaluated postoperatively to be free from disease. They received respectively 30, 60 and 100 mCi of radioiodine for thyroid remnant ablation.

Patients and methods

The project was designed as a two-stage, prospective randomized clinical trial.

The first part of the study was an early evaluation of the effectiveness of thyroid remnant 131I ablation treatment and was described in our previous papers [810]. In 1998-2001 210 low risk DTC patients, diagnosed with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, were randomly allocated to receive either 1100 MBq (30 mCi), or 2200 MBq (60 mCi) activity of 131I following total thyroidectomy and in most cases, central lymph node dissection [8, 9]. Only patients without lymph node metastases, staged pT1b-T3 or Tx and N0 or Nx were included. The condition to show stimulated Tg level <30 ng/ml was fulfilled for all of them.

From 2003 to 2005 as the completion of the range of 131I activities analyzed, we compared the effectiveness of two 131I activities, 60 mCi and 100 mCi. For this goal, 224 patients staged pT1b-T4 N0-1 were included, if they were diagnosed disease-free following total thyroidectomy and central/lateral lymph node dissection, when necessary.

131I treatment was performed after thyroid hormone withdrawal. A successful thyroid remnant ablation was defined as the absence of thyroid bed uptake in 131I neck scan and the stimulated thyroglobulin (Tg) value < 10 ng/ml, as judged after 12 months post 131I therapy [10].

The second stage of the study, presented now, comprised the long-term assessment of the disease follow-up in the study groups. 309 DTC patients (285 women and 24 men) with no clinical signs of persistent disease were included. There were 267 subjects with papillary and 44 with follicular carcinoma. 86 patients were initially treated with 30 mCi (group A), 128 with 60 mCi (group B) and 95 with 100 mCi (group C) post thyroidectomy.

In group A there were only patients in pT1b-T3 N0 M0 stage, in other cohorts the wider range of patients in pT1b-T4, N0-N1 M0 were included. The distribution of patients in early stages of the disease, who constituted the majority, in all groups was similar (table 1).
Table 1

TNM classification of DTC patients

 

T1b

T2

T3

T4

Tx

 

N0

N1

Nx

Total

Group A (30 mCi)

13 (15%)

42 (48%)

9 (10%)

0

20 (25%)

86 (100%)

46 (53%)

0

40 (47%)

86 (100%)

Group B (60 mCi)

37 (29%)

59 (46%)

11 (8%)

7 (5%)

14 (10%)

128 (100%)

74 (57%)

5 (4%)

49 (39%)

128 (100%)

Group C (100 mCi)

22 (23%)

50 (52%)

5 (4%)

7 (7%)

13 12(%)

95 (100%)

53 (55%)

13 (14%)

29 (31%)

95 (100%)

Total

72

151

25

14

47

309

173

18

118

309

The median follow-up was 10 years (range 2-11 years) for subjects treated with 30 mCi and 60 mCi and 6 years (range 2-6 years) for patients treated with 100 mCi of 131I. Only 5 patients in group A and 12 in group B and C were observed less than 6 years.

The most recent evaluation of the disease status and outcome were assessed by sonography, radiological examinations and serum Tg level (on LT4-suppressive treatment).

Results

In the early evaluation, described in details elsewhere [8, 9], there were 22% cases of incomplete thyroid remnant ablation after 30 mCi of 131I, requiring the second 131I therapy and 13,3% and 11,2% after 60 and 100 mCi respectively. The freedom from disease was confirmed by the low stimulated Tg in all patients during the evaluation done 6-12 months after the completion of adjuvant 131I therapy.

During the whole follow-up, the local relapse was stated in 2 (2.4%), 4 (3%) and 3 (3%) patients treated with 131I activities of 30 mCi, 60 mCi and 100 mCi respectively, without differences between groups.

If only patients in early stage of the disease were included (291 pT1-3,N0-x), local relapse was observed in 2 patients in group A and 3 and 2 in groups B and C respectively. Locoregional relapses were diagnosed after 8 and 3 years after surgery in group A, after 2, 4 and 9 years after surgery in group B and 1, 2, 3 years after surgery in group C, without any differences between groups.

During the whole follow-up we did not observe any distant recurrence in any of the patient.

The median last serum Tg level on LT4-suppressive treatment was low in all groups. Serum Tg concentration above the threshold of the method's sensitivity was observed in only one third of patients. Just a few subjects presented an increase serum level Tg without any localization of the cancer focus (table 2).
Table 2

Serum Tg level on LT4-suppressive treatment, as judged during the most recent examination in all patients.

Serum Tg level

GROUP A

GROUP B

GROUP C

No

86

128

95

Median

0,1 ng/ml

0,17 ng/ml

0,17 ng/ml

Higher than 0,17 ng/ml

21%

28%

29%

Maximal

1,1 ng/ml

6,4 ng/ml

8,15 ng/ml

Number of patients showing Tg>1 ng/ml

1

4*

4*

*In none of the patients the extended evaluation, including 131I scan, revealed disease foci.

Tg serum level evaluated on LT4-suppressive treatment analyzed in the group of patients with pT1-3,N0-x resembled data on lack of differences in Tg serum level in the whole group.

For some patients we performed a full diagnostic procedure during endogenous TSH stimulation, especially for those with slightly increased suppressed Tg level. For all of them stimulated Tg serum level was low and there were no significant differences between the groups. There were no localized disease cases either by 131I scan or by radiological examinations.

Discussion

Postoperative 131I therapy is the standard treatment for differentiated thyroid cancers.

In the USA it is only used with patients in more advanced DTC stage [2, 11]. In such cases the effectiveness of this method is undisputed. It has been proved that it decreases the risk of the recurrence and death due to DTC [11, 12]. It is more commonly used in Europe although it is still questionable if it is necessary with the patients in early disease stage [13]. However, it is important to remember that it allows a better follow-up through the improvement of specificity of serum thyroglobulin measurement and sensitivity of the whole body scan. Thus, it is routinely used in many European countries and recommended by Polish guidelines in all DTC cases but papillary microcancer [14]. In our clinical practice we use routinely 100 mCi 131I for thyroid remnant ablation. However, being aware of the possibility to use lesser activities, we decided to perform a prospective randomized trial with long term outcome. We plan to extend our observation till 10 years follow up will be reached, however, an interim analysis has been planed after 5 years and this short communication present its result. In the previous, initial part of the study we found that the 30 mCi activity was less effective than 60 mCi as more patients needed second 131I treatment [9], but 60 mCi was as good as 100 mCi [10]. The later evaluation of the therapeutic effect, presented in this paper, did not show significant differences in the effectiveness of 30, 60 and 100 mCi activities. In our study the majority of patients were diagnosed with early stage of the disease, so the results are related to low risk DTC patients treated by radical surgery. However, one limitation is obvious: in the group treated initially by 30 mCi of 131I 22% of patients required second course of 131I for complete thyroid ablation. Thus, in fact, the cumulative 131I activity administered was larger in 22% of patients and exceeded 100 mCi. The same occurred in 13,3% and 11,2% of patients treated with 60 and 100 mCi respectively. This will be considered at the final evaluation, however, already now we have to bear in mind that the apparent equality of various activities of 131I has to be interpreted with caution. All for whom the initial treatment proved insufficient during the first assessment were treated again with a higher activity which might have influenced the good general outcome of radioiodine treatment in the group treated with lower activities.

Conclusions

In the analyzed groups of patients no significant differences in 5 years efficacy of 131I thyroid remnant ablation were observed. However, to reach this goal, 22% of patients treated with 30 mCi required second course of radioiodine, while this was necessary only in 13,3% and 11,2% of patients treated with 60 and 100 mCi respectively.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This publication was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland - the grant of the Polish Thyroid Association.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology

References

  1. Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Harmer C, Berg GG, Cohen O, Duntas L, Jamar F, Jarzab B, Limbert E, Lind P, Reiners C, Sanchez Franco F, Smit J, Wiersinga W: Post-surgical use of radioiodine ( 131I ) in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid cancer and the issue of remnant ablation: a consensus report. Eur J of Endocrinol 2005, 153: 651–9. 10.1530/eje.1.02014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mazzaferri EL: Thyroid remnant 131I ablation for papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 1997, 7: 265–71. 10.1089/thy.1997.7.265PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. McCowen KD, Adler RA, Ghaed N, Verdon T, Hofeldt FD: Low dose radioiodide thyroid ablation in postsurgical patients with thyroid cancer. Am J Med 1976, 61: 52–8. 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90030-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal C, Padhy AK, Jana S, Pant GS, Basu AK: Prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate the optimal dose of 131 I for remnant ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 1996, 77: 2574–80. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2574::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-OPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Johansen K, Woodhouse NJ, Odugbesan O: Comparison of 1073 MBq and 3700 MBq iodine-131 in postoperative ablation of residual thyroid tissue in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 1991, 32: 252–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mäenpää HO, Heikkonen J, Vaalavirta L, Tenhunen M, Joensuu H: Low vs. high radioiodine activity to ablate the thyroid after thyroidectomy for cancer: a randomized study. PLoS One 2008, 3: e1885. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001885PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pacini F, Ladenson PW, Schlumberger M, Driedger A, Luster M, Kloos RT, Sherman S, Haugen B, Corone C, Molinaro E, Elisei R, Ceccarelli C, Pinchera A, Wahl RL, Leboulleux S, Ricard M, Yoo J, Busaidy NL, Delpassand E, Hanscheid H, Felbinger R, Lassmann M, Reiners C: Radioiodine ablation of thyroid remnants after preparation with recombinant human thyrotropin in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: results of an international, randomized, controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91: 926–32. 10.1210/jc.2005-1651PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gawkowska-Suwińska M: Ocena wczesnej skuteczności leczenia uzupełniającego izotopem jodu 131 I chorych na zróżnicowanego raka tarczycy. PhD Thesis; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Gawkowska-Suwińska M, Turska M, Roskosz J, Puch Z, Jurecka-Tuleja B, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Wygoda Z, Jarzab B: Early evaluation of treatment effectiveness using 131I iodine radiotherapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Wiad Lek 2001,54(Suppl 1):278–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kukulska A, Krajewska J, Roskosz J, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Jarzab M, Paliczka E, Puch Z, Wygoda Z, Gubała E, Jarzab B: Optimization of 131I ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: comparison of early outcomes of treatment with 100 mCi versus 60 mCi. Pol J Endocrinol 2006, 57: 374–379.Google Scholar
  11. Mazzaferri EL: An overview of the management of papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 1999,9(5):421–7. 10.1089/thy.1999.9.421PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sawka AM, Thephamongkhol K, Brouwers M, Thabane L, Browman G, Gerstein HC: Clinical review 170: A systematic review and metaanalysis of the effectiveness of radioactive iodine remnant ablation for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89: 3668–76. 10.1210/jc.2003-031167PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pacini F, Schumberger M, Dralle H, Elisei R, Smit JW, Wiersinga W, the European Thyroid Cancer Taskforce: European consensus for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium. Eur J Endocrinol 2006, 154: 787–803. 10.1530/eje.1.02158PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Diagnostyka I leczenie raka tarczycy. Rekomendacje Polskiej Grupy do spraw Nowotworów Endokrynnych Pol J Endocrinol 2010, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kukulska et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement