Open Access

COX-2 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) in cytological material obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)

  • Kinga Krawczyk-Rusiecka1,
  • Katarzyna Wojciechowska-Durczyńska1,
  • Anna Cyniak-Magierska1,
  • Zbigniew Adamczewski1,
  • Elżbieta Gałecka1 and
  • Andrzej Lewiński1Email author
Thyroid Research20114:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6614-4-3

Received: 8 December 2010

Accepted: 10 January 2011

Published: 10 January 2011

Abstract

Background

COX-2 is an enzyme isoform that catalyses the formation of prostanoids from arachidonic acid. An increased COX-2 gene expression is believed to participate in carcinogenesis. Recent studies have shown that COX-2 up-regulation is associated with the development of numerous neoplasms, including skin, colorectal, breast, lung, stomach, pancreas and liver cancers. COX-2 products stimulate endothelial cell proliferation and their overexpression has been demonstrated to be involved in the mechanism of decreased resistance to apoptosis. Suppressed angiogenesis was found in experimental animal studies as a consequence of null mutation of COX-2 gene in mice. Despite the role of COX-2 expression remains a subject of numerous studies, its participation in carcinogenesis or the thyroid cancer progression remains unclear.

Methods

Twenty three (23) patients with cytological diagnosis of PTC were evaluated. After FNAB examination, the needle was washed out with a lysis buffer and the obtained material was used for COX-2 expression estimation. Total RNA was isolated (RNeasy Micro Kit), and RT reactions were performed. β-actin was used as endogenous control. Relative COX-2 expression was assessed in real-time PCR reactions by an ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System, using the ΔΔCT method.

Results

COX-2 gene expression was higher in patients with PTC, when compared to specimens from patients with non-toxic nodular goitre (NTG).

Conclusions

The preliminary results may indicate COX-2 role in thyroid cancer pathogenesis, however the observed variability in results among particular subjects requires additional clinical data and tumor progression analysis.

Background

The most common thyroid malignancy is papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), accounting for approximately 85-90% of all thyroid cancers. PTC usually grows slowly and is clinically indolent, although aggressive forms can also occur. The 10-year survival rate for all PTC patients is estimated at 80-90% [1].

The introduction of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has made PTC identification more accurate, but still the diagnostic tools regarding the differentiation between thyroid benign and malignant lesions are not always reliable. The molecular basis of PTC has been examined and association with variety of molecular prognostic markers has been described, including RAS, RET, Trk, MET, and BRAF mutations [2].

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme isoform involved in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin H2, the precursor of various molecules, including prostaglandins, prostacyclines and thromboxanes. COX-2 can be expressed in response to various stimuli, such as hormones, mitogens, cytokines, inflammatory mediators and growth factors via protein kinase C and RAS-mediated signaling [3, 4]. The products of COX-2 activity are believed to be involved in carcinogenesis by promoting angiogenesis, inhibiting apoptosis, increasing cell invasion and stimulating cell proliferation. COX-2 also modulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production, the factor that promotes angiogenesis and decreases immunity toward cancer cells [59].

Recent studies have highlighted the relevance of COX-2 in human carcinogenesis. Increased levels of COX-2 have been reported in numerous tumours, including head and neck squamous cell cancer, as well as colorectal, breast, lung, skin, stomach, liver, pancreas, bladder, ovaries and prostate carcinomas [1019].

Selective inhibition of COX-2 is a novel therapy under investigation in both the chemoprevention and treatment of solid tumors [20, 21]. Experimental animal data indicate that COX-2 gene may be associated with carcinogenesis of several types of human malignancies.

Whether COX-2 expression is related to the morphology of PTC remains unclear. In the present study we have investigated COX-2 expression in 23 cases of PTC diagnosed cytologically following FNAB.

Methods

45 thyroid specimens were analyzed, i.e. 23 cases of PTC and 22 cases of benign thyroid lesions; 6 men and 39 women participated in the study. Patients ranged in age from 24 to 87 years (median - 48 years in PTC group, 58 years in benign thyroid lesions group). Thyroid aspirates, eligible for the study, were obtained from patients by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the Clinical Hospital No. 3, Medical University of Lodz (2007-2010). Each aspirate was smeared for conventional cytology, while the remaining part of aspirate was immediately washed out of the needle. The cells, obtained from the needle, were used in further investigation. Macroscopically unchanged thyroid tissue, collected from patients treated surgically, was used as an internal control.

The procedures, used in the study, were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (Poland). All patients were informed and agreed to participate in this study.

Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), based on modified Chomczyński and Sacchi's method [22]. RNA concentration was spectrophotometrically assessed by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Total RNA was reversely transcribed in a Mastercycler personal thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), according to manufacturer's procedures in a total volume of 50 μl including oligo d(T)16 (50 μM), MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (50 U/μl), 10 × TaqMan RT Buffer, MgCl2 solution (25 mM), dNTPs mixture (10 mM), RNAse Inhibitor (20 U/μl) and nuclease-free water (TaqMan Reverse Trancriptase Reagents, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The reactions were incubated for 10 min in 25°C, 30 min in 48°C, heated for 5 min in 95°C and placed at 4°C.

The relative expression of COX-2 gene was assessed, using the ABI PRISM 7500 SDS Software (ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System, Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The PCR reactions for COX-2 gene were run with 5 μl of cDNA in a total volume of 50 μl, using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and predesignated primer/probe set (Assays-on-Demand™ Gene Expression assay, Hs 00153133_m1, Applied Biosystems). Amplification reactions were done in triplicate for each examined sample.

Controls with no template cDNA were used with each assay. The reference gene was β-actin (Assays-on-Demand™ Gene Expression assay, Hs 99999903_m1, Applied Biosystems). Samples of cDNA were quantified using a fluorescence based real-time detection method (TaqMan).

Assays-on-Demand Gene Expression product consists of 20 × mix of unlabelled PCR primers and TaqMan MGB probe (5 μM) with FAM™(6-carboxy-fluorescein) at the 5' end as the reporter dye and a non-fluorescent quencher (TAMRA, 6-carboxy-tetramethylrhodamine) at the 3' end. Cycling conditions were 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 50 cycles at 95°C and 60°C for 1 minute. A sample of normal thyroid tissue served as a calibrator to compare the relative amount of target in different samples and to adjust for the plate-to-plate variation in amplification efficiency.

Data and statistical analysis

Relative gene expression - determined by comparing threshold cycle (C T ) for gene of interest (COX-2) with C T for the reference gene (β-actin) - was calculated using the ΔΔC T method as described previously [23]. The characteristics, RQ and ΔC T values of patients groups are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1

Gender, age, ddCT and RQ values in PTC group.

No.

Gender

Age

ddCT

RQ

1.

M

56

-0.84

1.79

2.

M

64

-0.71

1.63

3.

F

52

-6.49

89.8

4.

F

28

0.95

0.52

5.

F

53

-1.62

3.06

6.

M

61

-0.62

1.53

7.

F

57

-2.46

5.49

8.

F

36

-4.07

16.74

9.

F

56

-2.76

6.77

10.

M

58

-3.12

8.69

11.

F

28

1.31

0.4

12.

F

24

-1.31

2.48

13.

F

67

-1.51

2.84

14.

F

no data

1.24

2.36

15.

F

39

-2.0

4.01

16.

F

49

-0.75

1.68

17.

F

28

2.86

0.14

18.

F

45

-2.75

6.73

19.

F

50

-2.11

4.31

20.

F

63

-0.86

1.82

21.

M

53

-3.98

15.8

22.

F

39

-3.44

10.84

23.

F

49

-2.22

4.66

Table 2

Gender, age, ddCT and RQ values in NTG group.

No.

Gender

Age

ddCT

RQ

1.

F

27

-0.84

1.79

2.

F

87

-0.41

1.32

3.

F

65

1.98

0.25

4.

F

72

-1.01

2.02

5.

F

64

-2.32

4.71

6.

F

68

-0.01

1.01

7.

F

46

-2.07

4.21

8.

F

39

1.55

0.34

9.

M

56

-0.63

1.55

10.

F

68

-0.98

1.98

11.

F

62

2.94

0.13

12.

F

48

1.96

0.26

13.

F

32

-2.91

7.51

14.

M

61

-0.21

1.15

15.

F

29

0.74

0.6

16.

F

88

-0.68

1.6

17.

M

71

-1.53

2.88

18.

F

43

-0.46

1.37

19.

F

54

0.77

0.24

20.

F

50

-1.2

2.3

21.

F

79

-1.37

2.59

22.

F

71

-0.93

1.9

Statistical analysis was performed, using a standard parametric Student's t test, followed by non-parametric U Mann-Whitney's test. P values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

COX-2 mRNA expression was significantly higher in PTC when compared to benign thyroid lesions (Student's t-test, P = 0.021). There was no significant relationship between COX-2 expression and patients age and sex. The amplification plots of COX-2 and β-actin are shown in Figure. 1 and 2. The statistical analysis of COX-2 expression by quantitative Real Time PCR in PTC and NTG is presented in Figure. 3 and Figure. 4.
Figure 1

Representative amplification curves for COX-2 and β-actin genes in real-time PCR in PTC specimen. 1 a,b,c - amplification curve for COX-2 gene (mean C T value - 36.694); 2 - amplification curve for β-actin gene (endogenous control) (mean C T value - 27.071).

Figure 2

Representative amplification curves for COX-2 and β-actin genes in real-time PCR in macroscopically unchanged specimen. 1 a,b,c - amplification curve for COX-2 gene (mean C T value - 31.979); 2 - a mplification curve for β-actin gene (endogenous control) (mean C T value - 27.250).

Figure 3

Box-and-whisker plots representing the COX-2 mRNA expression by quantitative RT-PCR in PTC and NTG groups. Results are calculated as ddCT values. Whiskers represent means ± SD (standard deviation) for particular groups. Boxes represent means ± SEM (standard error of mean). The results were statistically analyzed, using Student's t test.

Figure 4

Box-and-whisker plots representing the COX-2 mRNA expression by quantitative RT-PCR in PTC and NTG groups. Results are calculated as RQ values. Whiskers represent means ± SD (standard deviation) for particular groups. Boxes represent means ± SEM (standard error of mean). The results were statistically analyzed, using Man-Whitney's U test (p < 0.05).

Discussion

The relation between COX-2 activity and carcinogenesis is being examined in variety of human neoplasms. Fine needle aspiration biopsy has become a critical diagnostic tool in management of thyroid nodules. It has allowed to decrease the number of cases inquiring surgical treatment from 67% to 44%; also the percentage of operated carcinomas in those nodules has increased from 14% to 29% [24]. Generally, preoperative discrimination of the thyroid malignancy, using not only cytopathology but also molecular markers, would enhance the proper diagnosis.

In our study, COX-2 expression in both NTG and PTC were examined. COX-2 expression was significantly higher in PTC group.

All but one of the previously conducted studies found overexpression of COX-2 in cases of PTC and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). In the study of Ito et al. [25], there were 9 COX-2-negative (18,4%) among 49 of PTC cases, studied by immunochemistry. They also suggested significant reduction of COX-2 levels in older patients (over 54 years old), in patients with large tumors and with the advanced disease stages, as well as with the presence of solid, scirrhous or trabecular growth pattern. An association among and age and worse prognosis has been well-recognized in the medical literature. Accordingly, Ito et al. [25] found that the COX-2 levels were significantly reduced in older patients, whereas Siironen et al. [26] demonstrated the older age group of patients, having a much worse prognosis and higher COX-2 levels. However, in our study, we have failed to establish statistical significance between COX-2 expression and patients' age or sex which is similar to results of Garcia-Gonzales et al [27].

The results of Kajita et al. [28] did not show any significant differences in COX-2 expression between normal thyroid tissue and PTC, because of variation in mRNA levels. The authors have also performed the in vitro study, with the TPC-1 thyroid carcinoma cell line and a compound NS-398 - a COX-2 enzymatic activity specific inhibitor, showing inhibited growth of tumor cells. They concluded the role of COX-2 in the growth of PTC cell lines.

Cornetta et al. [29] examined a variety of thyroid tissue specimens; COX-2 staining was not observed in none of the 6 specimens obtained from normal or multinodular goiter specimens. Analysis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis revealed COX-2 expression in the follicular epithelium and lymphocytic infiltrates, as well as in cases of FTC and PTC [29].

The study of Lee et al. [30] showed prominent expression of COX-2 in thyroiditis, benign and malignant thyroid lesions but not in normal thyroid tissues. They also observed no correlation between severity of PTC, regardless of the presence or absence of metastases. Because of the same intensity of COX-2 staining, found in thyroiditis, benign and malignant thyroid lesions the authors concluded that it is unlikely that COX-2 expression is related to the progression of thyroid disease.

The results of study with ApcΔ716 knockout mice [31], suggested that the induction of COX-2 was a very early event in colon carcinogenesis. This view has been supported by Garcia-Gonzales et al. [28] who have suggested that even though COX-2 plays an important role in progression of all thyroid cancers, in case of PTC it seems to be more important only in the early stages of disease.

Conclusions

The usefulness of COX-2 as a marker of thyroid malignancy has been challenged but its potential role in carcinogenesis arouses significant interest. In the present study, COX-2 expression was found in all studied samples and the elevated level of COX-2 gene expression was confirmed in PTC genetic material, collected from the fine-needle washout fluids. Thus, COX-2 gene may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of this cancer type. Furthermore, COX-2 gene overexpression levels were individually diversified, what may have resulted from their association with different genetic and clinical prognostic factors.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the funds of the Medical University of Lodz - Grant No. 502-11-843 and of the Ministry of Scientific Research and Information Technology of Poland - Grant No 1296/B/P01/2009/37.

The publication of the above article was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland - the grant of the Polish Thyroid Association.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute

References

  1. Sheils O: Molecular classification and biomarker discovery in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2005, 6: 927–946. 10.1586/14737159.5.6.927View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lewiński A, Wojciechowska K: Genetic background of carcinogenesis in the thyroid gland. Neuroendocrinol Lett 2007, 28: 77–105.Google Scholar
  3. Wirtschafter A, Schmidt R, Rosen D, Kundu N, Santoro M, Fusco A, Multhaupt H, Atkins JP, Rosen MR, Keane W, Rothstein JL: Expression of RET/PTC gene as a marker for papillary thyroid carcinoma on Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Laryngoscope 1997, 107: 95–100. 10.1097/00005537-199701000-00019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Califano D, Rizzo C, D'Alessio A, Colucci-D'Amato GL, Cali G, Bartoli PC, Santelli G, Vecchio G, de Francisis V: Signaling through Ras is essential for ret oncogene - induced cell differentiation in PC12 cells. J Biol Chem 2000, 275: 19297–19305. 10.1074/jbc.M905866199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Jones DA, Carlton DP, McIntyre TM, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM: Molecular cloning of human prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase type II and demonstration of expression in response to cytokines. J Biol Chem 1993, 268: 9049–9054.Google Scholar
  6. Tsujii M, DuBois RN: Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell 1995, 3: 493–501. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90127-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fosslien E: Molecular pathology of cyclooxygenase-2-cancer-induced angiogenesis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2001, 31: 325–348.Google Scholar
  8. Siironen P, Ristimäki A, Narko K, Nordling S, Louhimo J, Andersson S, Haapiainen R, Haglund C: VEGF-C and COX-2 expression in papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2006, 13: 465–473. 10.1677/erc.1.01114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Soh EY, Duh Q-Y, Sobhi SA, Young DM, Epstein HD, Wong MG, Garcia YK, Min YD, Grossman RF, Siperstein AE, Clark OH: Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is higher in differentiated thyroid cancer than in normal or benign thyroid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997, 82: 3741–3747. 10.1210/jc.82.11.3741Google Scholar
  10. Hwang D, Scollard D, Byrne J, Levine E: Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90: 455–460. 10.1093/jnci/90.6.455View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. van Rees BP, Saukkonen K, Ristimaki A, Polkowski W, Tytgat GN, Drillenburg P, Offerhaus GJ: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression during carcinogenesis in the human stomach. J Pathol 2002, 196: 171–179. 10.1002/path.1033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shirahama T, Sakakura C: Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7: 558–561.Google Scholar
  13. Soslow RA, Dannenberg AJ, Rush D, Woerner BM, Khan KN, Masferrer J, Koki AT: COX-2 is expressed in human pulmonary, colonic and mammary tumors. Cancer 2000, 89: 2537–2645. 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2637::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-BView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Eberhat CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, Giardiello FM, Ferrenbach S, DuBois RN: Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology 1994, 107: 1183–1188.Google Scholar
  15. Zimmermann KC, Sarbia M, Weber AA, Borchard F, Gabbert HE, Schror K: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Res 1999, 59: 198–204.Google Scholar
  16. Koga H, Sakisaka S, Ohishi M, Kawaguchi T, Taniguchi E, Sasatomi K, Harada M, Kusaba T, Tanaka M, Sata M: Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma: relevance to tumor dedifferentiation. Hepatology 1999, 29: 688–696. 10.1002/hep.510290355View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolf H, Saukkonen K, Anttila S, Karjalainen A, Vainio H, Ristimaki A: Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human lung carcinoma. Cancer Res 1998, 58: 4997–5001.Google Scholar
  18. Sano H, Kawahito Y, Wilder RL, Hashimoto A, Mukai S, Asai K, Kimura S, Kato H, Kondo M, Hla T: Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1995, 55: 3785–3789.Google Scholar
  19. Okami J, Yamamoto H, Fujiwara Y, Tsujie M, Kondo K, Noura S, Oshima S: Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in carcinoma of the pancreas. Clin Cancer Res 1999, 5: 2018–2024.Google Scholar
  20. Reddy BS, Hirose Y, Lubet R, Steele V, Kelloff G, Paulson S, Seibert K, Rao CV: Chemoprevention of colon cancer by specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, administered during different stages of carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2000, 60: 293–297.Google Scholar
  21. Ziegler J: Early trials probe COX-2 inhibitors' cancer - fighting potential. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999, 91: 1186–1187. 10.1093/jnci/91.14.1186View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Bioch 1987, 162: 156–159. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Brzezianska E, Cyniak-Magierska A, Sporny S, Pastuszak-Lewandoska D, Lewinski A: Assessment of cyclin D1 gene expression as prognostic factor in benign and malignant thyroid lesions. Neuroendocrinol Lett 2007, 28: 341–350.Google Scholar
  24. Hamberger B, Gharib H, Melton LJ, Goellner JR, Zinsmeister AR: Fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: impact on thyroid practice and cost of care. Am J Med 1982, 73: 381–384. 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90731-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ito Y, Yoshida H, Nakano K, Takmura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Yokozawa T, Kuma K, Miyauchi A: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in thyroid neoplasms. Histopathology 2003, 42: 492–497. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01624.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Siironen P, Louhimo J, Nordling S, Ristimaki A, Maenpaa H, Haapiainen R, Haglund C: Prognostic factors in papillary thyroid cancer: an evaluation of 601 consecutive patients. Tumor Biol 2005, 26: 57–64. 10.1159/000085586View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcia-Gonzales M, Abdulkader I, Vazquez Boquete A, Neo XM, Forteza J, Cameselle-Teijeiro J: Cyclooxygenase-2 in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic follicular cells of the human thyroid gland. Virchows Arch 2005, 447: 12–17. 10.1007/s00428-005-1235-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kajita S, Ruebel KH, Casey MB, Nakamura N, Lloyd RV: Role of COX-2, thromboxane A2 synthase, and prostaglandin I2 synthase in papillary thyroid carcinoma growth. Mod Pathol 2005, 18: 221–227. 10.1038/modpathol.3800285View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Cornetta AJ, Russell JP, Cunnane M, Keane WM, Rothstein IL: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human thyroid carcinoma and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Laryngoscope 2002, 112: 238–242. 10.1097/00005537-200202000-00008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee KJ, Jung YS, Kim WH, Yoon TI, Joo HJ, Soh EY: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human thyroid disease. J Endocrinol Invest 2008, 31: 111–118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Oshima M, Dinchuk JE, Kargman SL, Oshima H, Hancock B, Kwong E, Trzaskos JM, Evans JF, Taketo MT: Suppression of intestinal polyposis in Apc Δ716 knockout mice by inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell 1996, 5: 803–809. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81988-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Krawczyk-Rusiecka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement