Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Thyroid Research

Open Access

Extent of surgery in clinically evident but operable MTC – when is central and/or lateral lympadenectomy indicated?

Thyroid Research20136(Suppl 1):S3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6614-6-S1-S3

Published: 14 March 2013

Abstract

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) metastasizes very early lymphogeneously. It has been shown that the presence of lymph node metastases is associated with a worse outcome. Postoperative biochemical cure, i.e. normalization of posttherapeutical calcitonin levels, has been shown to correlate with a better outcome. The rate of biochemical cure decreases dramatically in the presence of lymph node metastases but can still be achieved in about 30-40% of patients despite the presence of lymph node metastases.

In 2009, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) published guidelines on the management of MTC. Various recommendations in the guidelines are dealing with the extent of lymph node dissection in different clinical settings. This article summarizes and comments on these recommendations.

Background

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) metastasizes very early lymphogenously.

The presence of initial lymph node metastases in non-screening patients is generally reported to be higher than 50%, often as high as 75-80% [1, 2]. Even bilateral lateral lymph node involvement is quite frequent (>25%) [2] and has been shown to be associated with distant metastases [3]. In these advanced cases, biochemical cure, i.e. normalization of posttherapeutical calcitonin levels, is extremely rare [4].

It has been shown that the presence of lymph node metastases in general is associated with a worse outcome [5]. Interestingly, it has less clearly been shown that lymphadenectomy improves the outcome in patients with MTC [5]. What has been shown is that, depending on patient selection, biochemical cure can be achieved in about 30-40% of patients with regional lymph node metastases [4, 6] which, however, is a significantly lower rate than that for patients without lymph node metastases (90-100%) [1, 6]. Biochemical cure itself has been shown to correlate with a better outcome [79] but late recurrence has been shown.

That the extent of lymph node dissection is part of ongoing discussion has apart from the unknown benefit in a specific patient in part to do with the possible complications that are accompanied with this procedure, mainly hypoparathyroidism and nerve injury [10]. In addition, in the presence of advanced disease, t.ex. distant metastases, the benefit of lymph node dissection is even more questionable.

ATA guidelines regarding lymphadenectomy

The guidelines published by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) [11] contain various recommendations dealing with the extent of lymphadenectomy.

Clinically evident or highly suspected MTC

According to the guidelines, patients having MTC or those where MTC is highly likely should undergo total thyroidectomy and prophylactic central compartment (level VI) neck dissection both with and without evidence of cervical lymph node metastases in the absence of advanced local invasion and distant metastases (recommendation 61 & 62). The lateral compartment (level II-V) should be included in the case of ultrasound-confirmed lateral lymph node metastases (recommendation 63). Preoperative ultrasound is therefore indicated in all patients prior to surgery (recommendation 19).

Some members of the task force recommended prophylactic inclusion of the lateral compartment recommended in the presence of central compartment lymph node metastases (recommendation 62). This recommendation is based on the finding that the involvement of the ipsilateral cervicolateral compartment correlates with the number of lymph node metastases in the central compartment [12].

Advanced disease

In general, a less aggressive approach is advised in the presence of advanced local and/or distant metastases while maintaining locoregional disease control to prevent central neck morbidity (recommendation 64 & 65). In patients with distant metastases, removal of small asymptomatic and nonthreatening lymph node metastases (<1 cm) is of unknown benefit and such lymph nodes may be observed (recommendation 81).

Primary incomplete surgery

Following primary incomplete surgery, reoperation including the central lymph node compartment is recommended when neck US is suspicious for persistent local disease in the central or lateral neck compartment (recommendation 71) or when the basal serum calcitonin level is above the normal reference range (recommendation 72).

If not previously performed, node dissection in both the central and lateral compartment should be compartment-oriented. Removal of only grossly metastatic lymph nodes, or other limited procedures, should be avoided in these instances (recommendation 77). This recommendation is based on the fact that removal of only grossly metastatic lymph nodes correlates with a lower calcitonin normalization rate, a higher reoperation rate and a lower survival rate [13].

In view of the ATA guidelines, central lymph node dissection remains controversial if primary surgery only consisted of total thyroidectomy in patients with continuously elevated calcitonin levels in the absence of radiographic findings (recommendation 78). It is explained in the guidelines that controversy also exist due to the increased risk of harm. It is obvious that the surgical experience and expertise plays an important role in this regard. Of note, it must be primarily assumed that continuously elevated calcitonin levels following thyroidectomy mainly are due to lymph node metastases left in situ. Calcitonin normalization has in selected patients been observed in up to 35-40% even after reoperation [14, 15] and may actually be as low as 6% if one waits for radiographic positive findings [16]. Thus the recommendation to wait for positive imaging as suggested by the ATA guidelines is questionable.

Hereditary MTC

In patients with hereditary MTC, early identification of patients, e.g. through family screening, may enable to limit the extent of surgery to the thyroid gland since lymph node metastases may be very unlikely if preoperative calcitonin levels are normal [17, 18]. Besides patient’s age, primary tumor size and calcitonin levels may be helpful in determining the surgical extent. The ATA guidelines give some recommendations in this regard (recommendations 33, 35, 40-43). Since this review is focusing on clinically evident MTC, these recommendations will not be discussed in detail here.

Further comments

In general, lymph node dissection should be very restrictive in the presence of advanced local and/or distant disease. This is justified by the very low chance to cure those patients [6] where no benefit might be gained from the lymph node dissection. In these instances, the calcitonin doubling-times may be of help assessing patient’s prognosis where doubling-tomes less than 6 months are very unfavourable [19].

Clinically evident or highly suspected lymph node metastases

Taken the above into account, dissection is almost always indicated in the presence of cervical lymph nodes metastases. Clinically, the presence of lymph node metastases is most often assumed in the presence of enlarged lymph nodes. Fine-needle aspiration is rarely performed. However, lymph node metastases in MTC are typically rather small in size and, thus, normal lymph node size does not exclude the presence of metastases.

Unknown lymph node status

If no enlarged lymph nodes are present, the extent of lymph node dissection is much more difficult to assess. This situation, however, is very common.

Most surgeons would recommend central lymphadenectomy (defined as dissection of level VI) in all patients with sporadic MTC and in all screening patients with elevated calcitonin levels at the time thyroidectomy is performed due to the high likelhood of the presence of positive lymph nodes [20]. The exception are screening patients with normal calcitonin levels that probably have an extremely low risk that lymph node metastases exist [17, 18]. These patients may therefore forego lymphadenectomy. As mentioned before, one reason to avoid cervical lymphadenectomy is the observed higher rate of complications [10]. The reason to perform central lymphadenectomy synchronous with thyroidectomy is that metachronous lymphadenectomy confers an even higher risk of complications. This does not apply to the lateral compartments (level II-V) that are not touched if the previous operation consist of thyroidectomy both with and without central lymphadenectomy.

Since the ipsilateral cervicolateral compartment contains almost as often lymph node metastases as the central compartment [21], some surgeons would recommend performing both central and lateral lymphadenactomy synchronous with thyroidectomy. Others have recommended lateral lymph node dissection “on demand”, i.e. in the setting of measurable postoperative bCT and/or sCT levels indicating LN metastasis [22]. In the case of contralateral positive lymph nodes, the chance of biochemical cure decreases dramatically [21] and no beneficial outcome has been shown if lymphadenectomy is performed in these patients.

Assessing the lymph node status

The question is how the extent of lymph node metastases can be assessed pre- or at the latest intraoperatively in MTC patients.

Imaging techniques

The accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography for evaluating cervical lymph node metastases in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma is not very high, 74% vs. 68 resp. [23]. Since it is known that lymph mode metastases in MTC are often rather small as compared to papillary thyroid carcinoma, the accuracy is expected to be lower which has indeed been shown [24]. Both, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and, in particular, FDG-PET have been used with some success in detecting lymph node metastaes preoperatively but the reported series are small [2428].

In reoperative cases, a variety of imaging techniques (ultrasound, computed tomography, FDG-PET) seems to have a low sensitivity (56%, 42%, and 32%, respectively).

Thus, currently available imaging techniques are of minor value identifying small lymph node metastases. Ultrasound, which is readily available, is the investigation of choice and should always be performed first.

Venous sampling

In reoperative cases, it has been shown that pentagastrin-stimulated intravenous calcitonin sampling followed by targeted surgery may be beneficial in the diagnostic work-up of MTC after thyroidectomy [29]. However, the number of reported cases is low and the real value is not known yet.

Primary tumor size

Even small tumors (<1 cm) inherit a risk for lymph node metastases that increases with tumor size [30]. Patients having a primary tumor of less than 5 mm in size have a risk of having lymph node metastases between 13-20% if sporadic and between 6-14% if hereditary. The biochemical cure rates at these early stages are 69-85% and 80-96%, respectively. Concerning tumors smaller than 1 cm in size, lymph node metastases are found in 5-31% and the biochemical cure ranges from 71% to 100% (reviewed in [30]). Thus, even at these early stages, lymph node metastases are not uncommon [31].

Thus, lymph node metastases are not uncommon even in small primary tumors. The tumor size is, hence, of less value in assessing the presence of lymph node metastases in patients with MTC.

Lymph node metastases in the central compartment

Studies have shown that the involvement of the ipsilateral cervicolateral compartment correlates with the number of lymph node metastases in the central compartment. If more than 3 lymph nodes in the cervicocentral compartment were involved, almost all patients had lateral lymph node metastases in one study [12]. This “marker”, however, is of less use in the clinical setting in the absence of macroscopically enlarged lymph nodes since it is not possible to determine the numbers of central lymph node metastases within a decent time period intraoperatively so far. Of note, lateral lymph node metastases were found in about 10% even in the absence of central lymph node metastases. This finding, i.e. the presence of cervicolateral lymph node metastases without cervicocentral compartment involvement, often referred to as skip metastases [32], has even been found in up to 35% by others [33].

Calcitonin levels

Concerning microMTC (<1 cm), calcitonin levels cannot distinguish between patients with and without lymph node metastases [22]. This is also true for patients with larger primary tumors even though higher basal calcitonin levels correlate better than pentagastrin stimulated calcitonin levels with lymph node involvement [20]. In the latter study, both central and ipsilateral lateral lymph node metastases were present in about 10% of the patients already at a basal level of 20 pg/mL. In patients higher than 200 pg/mL, contralateral lateral lymph node involvement was observed in at least 12% of the patients.

One study showed that intraoperative stimulated calcitonin levels following thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection correlated well with the presence of lateral lymph node metastases [34]. The intraoperative usefulness of this technique would require quick calcitonin assays. Currently, the analysis takes several hours.

Age

While age plays an important role assessing timing and extent in patients with hereditary MTC [35], it does not seem to play a role in sporadic MTC.

Other “markers”

Beside these more traditional markers, other markers are sought after.

Of interest, one such “marker” has been cervical pain. In one study, the authors reported that roughly 80% of their patients with MTC presented with neck pain (defined as any subjective complaint of anterior neck discomfort, ache, pressure, or sharp, throbbing, or dull sensations in the region of the thyroid gland, with or without palpation) as opposed to only 6% of their patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [36]. However, even 36% of those without pain had lymph node metastases.

Desmoplastic stromal reaction is one of those intraoperative markers that appear to have more clinical value. In one study analyzing 120 MTCs, it was shown that desmoplastic stromal reaction, which can be assessed intraoperatively, has a low (38%) sensitivity of predicting N0 but a very high (100%) specificity. The authors therefore recommend avoiding lymph node dissection in the absence of desmoplastic stromal reaction [37]. The results where later shown to be reproducible by other pathologists [38] but larger prospective studies are missing yet.

Conclusions

If advanced disease is absent, central lymph node dissection is almost always indicated at the initial operation in patients with clinically evident MTC. Synchronous inclusion of the ipsilateral lateral compartment is recommended by some but might probably also be done ”on demand” if postoperative calcitonin levels remain elevated.

In reoperative cases, the extent of lymph node dissection depends primarily on the extent of previous operation(s). Compartments that have not been operated on in a systematic way, i.e. dissection of all lymph node and the connective tissue “en bloc”, should be operated in this manner. Node picking should be reserved to those compartments that have been operated on systematically. I these cases, positive imaging is required. This approach, however, has not been proven to be of any benefit for the patient.

Future research has to concentrate on improving preoperative imaging and on the identification of intraoperative measurable markers that correlate with the presence or absence of lymph node metastases with a high accuracy.

Declarations

Declarations

This article has been published as part of Thyroid Research Volume 6 Supplement 1, 2013: European comments on Medullary Thyroid Cancer Management Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.thyroidresearchjournal.com/supplements/6/S1. Publication of this supplement has been supported by the European Thyroid Association-Cancer Research Network.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University
(2)
Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland

References

  1. Weber T, Schilling T, Frank-Raue K, Colombo-Benkmann M, Hinz U, Ziegler R, Klar E: Impact of modified radical neck dissection on biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinomas. Surgery 2001,130(6):1044–1049. 10.1067/msy.2001.118380aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hamy A, Raffaitin P, Floch I, Paineau J, Mirallie E, Visset J: [The importance of lymph node dissection in medullary thyroid macrocarcinomas]. Ann Chir 2003,128(7):447–451. 10.1016/S0003-3944(03)00179-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Dralle H: Contralateral cervical and mediastinal lymph node metastasis in medullary thyroid cancer: systemic disease? Surgery 2006,139(1):28–32. 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Machens A, Gimm O, Ukkat J, Hinze R, Schneyer U, Dralle H: Improved prediction of calcitonin normalization in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients by quantitative lymph node analysis. Cancer 2000,88(8):1909–1915. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8<1909::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-AView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kandil E, Gilson MM, Alabbas HH, Tufaro AP, Dackiw A, Tufano RP: Survival implications of cervical lymphadenectomy in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011,18(4):1028–1034. 10.1245/s10434-010-1363-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gimm O, Ukkat J, Dralle H: Determinative factors of biochemical cure after primary and reoperative surgery for sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg 1998,22(6):562–567. discussion 567–568 10.1007/s002689900435View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dottorini ME, Assi A, Sironi M, Sangalli G, Spreafico G, Colombo L: Multivariate analysis of patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. Prognostic significance and impact on treatment of clinical and pathologic variables. Cancer 1996,77(8):1556–1565. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960415)77:8<1556::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-YView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Raffaitin P, Hamy A, Mirallie E, Meurette G, Duplessis R, Lemeunier P, Murat A, Le Bodic M, Le Neel JC, Paineau J, et al.: [Prognostic factors of survival without clinical recurrences in medullary thyroid carcinoma: apropos of 52 operated cases]. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 1999,60(6):435–442.Google Scholar
  9. Rendl G, Manzl M, Hitzl W, Sungler P, Pirich C: Long-term prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008,69(3):497–505. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03229.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheah WK, Arici C, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Clark OH: Complications of neck dissection for thyroid cancer. World J Surg 2002,26(8):1013–1016. 10.1007/s00268-002-6670-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kloos RT, Eng C, Evans DB, Francis GL, Gagel RF, Gharib H, Moley JF, Pacini F, Ringel MD, Schlumberger M, et al.: Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid 2009,19(6):565–612. 10.1089/thy.2008.0403View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Machens A, Hauptmann S, Dralle H: Prediction of lateral lymph node metastases in medullary thyroid cancer. Br J Surg 2008,95(5):586–591. 10.1002/bjs.6075View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dralle H, Damm I, Scheumann GF, Kotzerke J, Kupsch E, Geerlings H, Pichlmayr R: Compartment-oriented microdissection of regional lymph nodes in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Today 1994,24(2):112–121. 10.1007/BF02473391View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gimm O, Dralle H: Reoperation in metastasizing medullary thyroid carcinoma: is a tumor stage-oriented approach justified? Surgery 1997,122(6):1124–1130. discussion 1130–1121 10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90217-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moley JF, Dilley WG, DeBenedetti MK: Improved results of cervical reoperation for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg 1997,225(6):734–740. discussion 740–733 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00011PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleming JB, Lee JE, Bouvet M, Schultz PN, Sherman SI, Sellin RV, Friend KE, Burgess MA, Cote GJ, Gagel RF, et al.: Surgical strategy for the treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg 1999,230(5):697–707. 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00013PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dralle H, Gimm O, Simon D, Frank-Raue K, Gortz G, Niederle B, Wahl RA, Koch B, Walgenbach S, Hampel R, et al.: Prophylactic thyroidectomy in 75 children and adolescents with hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma: German and Austrian experience. World J Surg 1998,22(7):744–750. discussion 750–741 10.1007/s002689900463View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Machens A, Lorenz K, Dralle H: Individualization of lymph node dissection in RET (rearranged during transfection) carriers at risk for medullary thyroid cancer: value of pretherapeutic calcitonin levels. Ann Surg 2009,250(2):305–310. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ae333fView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Barbet J, Campion L, Kraeber-Bodere F, Chatal JF: Prognostic impact of serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling-times in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005,90(11):6077–6084. 10.1210/jc.2005-0044View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Machens A, Dralle H: Biomarker-based risk stratification for previously untreated medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010,95(6):2655–2663. 10.1210/jc.2009-2368View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Machens A, Hinze R, Thomusch O, Dralle H: Pattern of nodal metastasis for primary and reoperative thyroid cancer. World J Surg 2002,26(1):22–28. Epub 2001 Nov 2022 10.1007/s00268-001-0176-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Scheuba C, Kaserer K, Bieglmayer C, Asari R, Riss P, Drosten R, Niederle B: Medullary thyroid microcarcinoma recommendations for treatment - a single-center experience. Surgery 2007,142(6):1003–1010. discussion 1010 e1001–1003 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ahn JE, Lee JH, Yi JS, Shong YK, Hong SJ, Lee DH, Choi CG, Kim SJ: Diagnostic accuracy of CT and ultrasonography for evaluating metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with thyroid cancer. World J Surg 2008,32(7):1552–1558. 10.1007/s00268-008-9588-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Szakall Jnr. S, Esik O, Bajzik G, Repa I, Dabasi G, Sinkovics I, Agoston P, Tron L: 18F-FDG PET detection of lymph node metastases in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2002,43(1):66–71.Google Scholar
  25. Czepczynski R, Parisella MG, Kosowicz J, Mikolajczak R, Ziemnicka K, Gryczynska M, Sowinski J, Signore A: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007,34(10):1635–1645. 10.1007/s00259-007-0479-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mucha SA, Kunert-Radek J, Pomorski L: Positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) in the detection of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endokrynol Pol 2006,57(4):452–455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Brandt-Mainz K, Muller SP, Gorges R, Saller B, Bockisch A: The value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2000,27(5):490–496. 10.1007/s002590050533View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Krausz Y, Rosler A, Guttmann H, Ish-Shalom S, Shibley N, Chisin R, Glaser B: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for early detection of regional and distant metastases of medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. Clin Nucl Med 1999,24(4):256–260. 10.1097/00003072-199904000-00008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schott M, Willenberg HS, Sagert C, Nguyen TB, Schinner S, Cohnen M, Cupisti V, Eisenberger CF, Knoefel WT, Scherbaum WA: Identification of occult metastases of medullary thyroid carcinoma by pentagastrin-stimulated intravenous calcitonin sampling followed by targeted surgery. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007,66(3):405–409. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02747.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Machens A, Dralle H: Biological relevance of medullary thyroid microcarcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012,97(5):1547–1553. 10.1210/jc.2011-2534View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA: Medullary thyroid microcarcinoma: a population-level analysis of 310 patients. Cancer 2012,118(3):620–627. 10.1002/cncr.26283View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Dralle H: Skip metastases in thyroid cancer leaping the central lymph node compartment. Arch Surg 2004,139(1):43–45. 10.1001/archsurg.139.1.43View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tavares MR, Michaluart P Jr., Montenegro F, Arap S, Sodre M, Takeda F, Brandao L, Toledo S, Ferraz A: Skip metastases in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a single-center experience. Surg Today 2008,38(6):499–504. 10.1007/s00595-007-3664-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheuba C, Bieglmayer C, Asari R, Kaczirek K, Izay B, Kaserer K, Niederle B: The value of intraoperative pentagastrin testing in medullary thyroid cancer. Surgery 2007,141(2):166–171. discussion 171–162 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Machens A, Niccoli-Sire P, Hoegel J, Frank-Raue K, van Vroonhoven TJ, Roeher HD, Wahl RA, Lamesch P, Raue F, Conte-Devolx B, et al.: Early malignant progression of hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med 2003,349(16):1517–1525. 10.1056/NEJMoa012915View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Guerrero MA, Lindsay S, Suh I, Vriens MR, Khanafshar E, Shen WT, Gosnell J, Kebebew E, Duh QY, Clark OH: Medullary Thyroid Cancer: It is a pain in the neck? J Cancer 2011, 2: 200–205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheuba C, Kaserer K, Kaczirek K, Asari R, Niederle B: Desmoplastic stromal reaction in medullary thyroid cancer-an intraoperative "marker" for lymph node metastases. World J Surg 2006,30(5):853–859. 10.1007/s00268-005-0391-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Koperek O, Scheuba C, Cherenko M, Neuhold N, De Micco C, Schmid KW, Niederle B, Kaserer K: Desmoplasia in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a reliable indicator of metastatic potential. Histopathology 2008,52(5):623–630. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03002.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gimm; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement