- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
Ultrasound and cytological diagnostics of thyroid - its proper application in case of coexisting disturbing clinical signs and symptoms, suggestive of active proliferative lesion
Thyroid Researchvolume 8, Article number: A19 (2015)
Currently, the most important clinical issue for a practicing endocrinologist is to answer the question whether the detection of a thyroid nodule/nodules during physical examination or thyroid focal lesion/lesions in the ultrasound (US) scan provides the basis for referring the patient for surgery.
The fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) performance is recommended for each case of:
1) a palpable nodule corresponding to focal lesion with diameter of 5 mm or more, revealed during US examination,
2) an impalpable lesion with a diameter of 10 mm and more,
3) a lesion with suspicious US features, suggesting the malignancy (see: Table 1).
At the present stage, US examination still cannot be conducted with such precision so that it alone will be able to document the occurrence of malignancy and constitute a definitive diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Simultaneous visualization of even a few suspicious US features, as well as demonstration of enlarged cervical lymph nodes, together with observations of changes with time of thyroid lesions and of lymph nodes, can only bring us closer to a final diagnosis.
The most suspicious feature is the shape of a nodule/US focal lesion. Accordingly, "standing egg” or “taller-than-wide” shape - on transverse or longitudinal planes - can much more likely be related to the presence of malignancy . This feature is estimated to be present in approximately 90% malignant cases . This is due to the fact that malignant lesions grow across the normal tissue plane in a centrifugal manner .
We have grouped the individual US features into mnemonics, to facilitate their permanent memorising. Mnemonics are made up of the first letters of the names of these characteristics. Our experience allows us to propose a system that is based on assigning the points to each US feature. The principle of assessment is to add points, which will allow classification of the lesions to particular groups of a different risk of malignancy (Table 2).
Two signs/symptoms presented in the bottom of Table 2 are of crucial significance since they indicate a serious suspicion of the malignancy. Thus, occurrence of each of these two features is associated with granting of 3 points.
In addition to US data, one should account several clinical signs and symptoms, such as occurrence of hoarseness, dysphagia or pain which result from the presence of the thyroid tumour of firm consistency. Also of importance is information on inherited diseases, with particular stress on multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A and 2B (MEN 2A and 2B), familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC) or familial non-MTC (FNMTC) in 1st degree relatives, as well as history of neck, head, chest or whole body irradiation - especially if it relates to the childhood. Another high risk factor of thyroid cancer that absolutely qualifies for further diagnostic investigation is patients’ age - under 20 and over 60 years, as well as male sex is regarded as a risk factor for malignancy of thyroid lesions.
The coexistence of essential disturbing clinical signs and symptoms, mentioned above, provide additional data indicating an increased risk of the malignant neoplastic disease. For easier memorising the list of disturbing signs and symptoms, we propose two subsequent mnemonics illustrated in Table 3.
According to our opinion, introduction of the scoring system for the disturbing symptoms and signs is useless because their assessment can be simply achieved by applying common sense. In other words, the occurrence of almost all of these symptoms by itself requires the execution of all possible diagnostic tests, followed by treatment implementation. In any case, a reassuring outcome of US and FNAB examination should not cause failure to the appropriate diagnostics and treatment.
Most authors assume that FNAB of the thyroid is a basic procedure for qualifying the patient for surgery or clinical observation. Generally accepted classification of FNAB diagnostic categories is shown in Table 4 .
However, one must be aware of aspiration cytology limitations, resulting from the specificity of FNAB technique itself. This entails the risk of false negative results of a few percent, and less - false positives results. Even a diagnosis of "benign lesion" (category II acc. TBSRTC), assuming a proper sample collection from the tested lesion, is still associated with a risk of cancer but less than 3% . Nevertheless, the authors of recent study suggest that repeated FNAB in the category in question can be performed only after 2 to 4 years, if the first FNAB indicated benign character of the lesion; the above recommendation applies to lesions in asymptomatic patients with no risk factors .
FNAB limitations result also from the nature of an assessed lesion itself, especially in situations when the final diagnosis can be formulated only on the basis of histopathological examination - e.g. follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). Diagnoses of "follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)/atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)" (category III TBSRTC)  or of "follicular-neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm" (category IV) relate - in most cases - to hyperplastic nodules or follicular adenoma rather than to FTC. In practice, it means that follicular adenoma and FTC cannot be distinguished on the basis of cytological examination.
According to TBSRTC recommendations , category III should only be used in exceptional situations when it is not possible to establish a more precise cytological diagnosis since cytological findings are not convincingly benign to be classified as category II, yet the degree of cellular or architectural changes is not sufficient for an interpretation of category IV and - even more - of category V (“suspicious for malignancy”). Moreover, the authors of recent study suggest that the patients with cytological diagnosis - AUS (within category III TBSRTC) should be qualified to surgery much more often than the patients with FLUS (also category III), because of significantly higher risk of malignancy .
Not every FNAB result may precisely identify what type of treatment should be applied; all non-diagnostic or unsatisfactory smears are assigned to category I. Such a result is an indication for repeat biopsy, usually within 3-6 months, sometimes sooner, because the risk of malignancy is not quite small and it is rated for a few percent.
The most important objective of our presentation is to propose an algorithm of diagnostic and therapeutic management in thyroid nodules/US focal lesions which is based on the information from both US image and FNAB cytology. In Figure 1 we have presented the modified version of our earlier algorithms [1, 4]; for modification we have taken into account the recent reports of other authors [8, 9].
Lewiński A, Adamczewski Z: Decision making for surgery in the suspect thyroid nodule. (Proper application of ultrasound (US) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) completed but do not replace coexisting worrying clinical signs and symptoms). Thyroid Intern 2013, 1: 3–18.
Moon WJ, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim DW, Kim EK, Kim JY, et al.: Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2011,12(1):1–14.
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM: Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009,19(11):1167–1214.
Adamczewski Z, Lewiński A: Proposed algorithm for management of patients with thyroid nodules/focal lesions, based on ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB); our own experience. Thyroid Res 2013, 6: 6.
Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK, Kim MJ: A taller-than-wide shape in thyroid nodules in transverse and longitudinal ultrasonographic planes and the prediction of malignancy. Thyroid 2011,21(11):1249–1253.
Alexander EK, Marqusee E, Orcutt J, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Cibas ES, Atri A: Thyroid nodule shape and prediction of malignancy. Thyroid 2004,14(11):953–958.
Cibas ES, Ali SZ: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2009,19(11):1159–1165.
Nou E, Kwong N, Alexander LK, Cibas ES, Marqusee E, Alexander EK: Determination of the optimal time interval for repeat evaluation after a benign thyroid nodule aspiration. Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014,99(2):510–516.
Choi YJ, Baek JH, Ha EJ, Lim HK, Lee JH, Kim JK, Song DE, Shong YK, Hong SJ: Differences in risk of malignancy and management recommendations in subcategories of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance: the role of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy. Thyroid 2014,24(3):494–501.