- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
Ultrasound and cytological diagnostics of thyroid - its proper application in case of coexisting disturbing clinical signs and symptoms, suggestive of active proliferative lesion
© Lewiński and Adamczewski; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015
- Published: 22 June 2015
- Thyroid Cancer
- Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma
- Follicular Adenoma
- Cytological Diagnosis
- Thyroid Lesion
Currently, the most important clinical issue for a practicing endocrinologist is to answer the question whether the detection of a thyroid nodule/nodules during physical examination or thyroid focal lesion/lesions in the ultrasound (US) scan provides the basis for referring the patient for surgery.
The fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) performance is recommended for each case of:
1) a palpable nodule corresponding to focal lesion with diameter of 5 mm or more, revealed during US examination,
2) an impalpable lesion with a diameter of 10 mm and more,
Definitions of suspicious US features (the, so-called, US patterns), in contrast to US patterns speaking for a benign nature of lesion .
- assessed especially as the presence of microcalcifications, also their coexistence with other forms of calcifications (e.g. dystrophic), in contrast to the absence of calcifications (the latter suggesting benign nature of lesions);
- “taller-than-wide” shape on transverse and longitudinal planes, in contrast to all other shapes;
- the presence of increased irregular chaotic central blood flows; this group includes also hypoechoic lesions when accompanied by a total absence of blood flow; in contrast to the peripheral, subcapsular blood flow (suggesting benign lesions);
- hypoechogenicity, defined as “darker” than normal thyroid echogenicity, and described as similar to the echogenicity of muscles surrounding the gland, especially sternocleidomastoid muscles;
- uneven thickness of halo (outer shell that surrounds the lesion) or absence of halo, in contrast to thin halo, regularly surrounding the lesion;
- solid lesions, also mixed lesions with cystic portion not exceeding 10% of the volume, in contrast to mixed lesions with cystic parts greater than 10% of total volume, as well as to lesions with solely cystic composition;
- the size of lesion greater than 3 cm in diameter, in contrast to smaller lesions;
- poorly defined and irregular, sometimes infiltrated border, in contrast to a well-differentiated regular margin;
- the enlargement of lesion by at least 20% in two dimensions, i.e. at least 50% by volume (for the lesion in diameter of less than 10 mm - minimum 2 mm in two dimensions) in a period of time shorter than 1.5 years [2, 3];
Lymph node invasion
- the presence of lymph nodes, suspicious in US evaluation and of the size larger than 5-8 mm in the smallest dimension .
At the present stage, US examination still cannot be conducted with such precision so that it alone will be able to document the occurrence of malignancy and constitute a definitive diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Simultaneous visualization of even a few suspicious US features, as well as demonstration of enlarged cervical lymph nodes, together with observations of changes with time of thyroid lesions and of lymph nodes, can only bring us closer to a final diagnosis.
The most suspicious feature is the shape of a nodule/US focal lesion. Accordingly, "standing egg” or “taller-than-wide” shape - on transverse or longitudinal planes - can much more likely be related to the presence of malignancy . This feature is estimated to be present in approximately 90% malignant cases . This is due to the fact that malignant lesions grow across the normal tissue plane in a centrifugal manner .
The scoring system of US features (patterns) assessed in thyroid nodules/focal lesions. Low risk US pattern – 0 < 3 points; intermediate risk US pattern – ³ 3 < 7 points; high risk US pattern - ³ 7 points (note scoring system modification when compared with ref. ).
CODE (each feature – 1 point)
Max. no. of points – 4
HELM (each feature – 0.5 point)
Max. no. of points – 2
AL (each feature – 3 points)
Max. no. of points – 6
Lymph node involvement
Two signs/symptoms presented in the bottom of Table 2 are of crucial significance since they indicate a serious suspicion of the malignancy. Thus, occurrence of each of these two features is associated with granting of 3 points.
In addition to US data, one should account several clinical signs and symptoms, such as occurrence of hoarseness, dysphagia or pain which result from the presence of the thyroid tumour of firm consistency. Also of importance is information on inherited diseases, with particular stress on multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A and 2B (MEN 2A and 2B), familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC) or familial non-MTC (FNMTC) in 1st degree relatives, as well as history of neck, head, chest or whole body irradiation - especially if it relates to the childhood. Another high risk factor of thyroid cancer that absolutely qualifies for further diagnostic investigation is patients’ age - under 20 and over 60 years, as well as male sex is regarded as a risk factor for malignancy of thyroid lesions.
Disturbing signs and symptoms that require inquisitive intense diagnostics, regardless of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) category and US pattern .
According to our opinion, introduction of the scoring system for the disturbing symptoms and signs is useless because their assessment can be simply achieved by applying common sense. In other words, the occurrence of almost all of these symptoms by itself requires the execution of all possible diagnostic tests, followed by treatment implementation. In any case, a reassuring outcome of US and FNAB examination should not cause failure to the appropriate diagnostics and treatment.
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) – according to Cibas and Ali .
Risk of malignancy (%)
Nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory
Atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance
Follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm
Suspicious for malignancy
However, one must be aware of aspiration cytology limitations, resulting from the specificity of FNAB technique itself. This entails the risk of false negative results of a few percent, and less - false positives results. Even a diagnosis of "benign lesion" (category II acc. TBSRTC), assuming a proper sample collection from the tested lesion, is still associated with a risk of cancer but less than 3% . Nevertheless, the authors of recent study suggest that repeated FNAB in the category in question can be performed only after 2 to 4 years, if the first FNAB indicated benign character of the lesion; the above recommendation applies to lesions in asymptomatic patients with no risk factors .
FNAB limitations result also from the nature of an assessed lesion itself, especially in situations when the final diagnosis can be formulated only on the basis of histopathological examination - e.g. follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). Diagnoses of "follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)/atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)" (category III TBSRTC)  or of "follicular-neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm" (category IV) relate - in most cases - to hyperplastic nodules or follicular adenoma rather than to FTC. In practice, it means that follicular adenoma and FTC cannot be distinguished on the basis of cytological examination.
According to TBSRTC recommendations , category III should only be used in exceptional situations when it is not possible to establish a more precise cytological diagnosis since cytological findings are not convincingly benign to be classified as category II, yet the degree of cellular or architectural changes is not sufficient for an interpretation of category IV and - even more - of category V (“suspicious for malignancy”). Moreover, the authors of recent study suggest that the patients with cytological diagnosis - AUS (within category III TBSRTC) should be qualified to surgery much more often than the patients with FLUS (also category III), because of significantly higher risk of malignancy .
Not every FNAB result may precisely identify what type of treatment should be applied; all non-diagnostic or unsatisfactory smears are assigned to category I. Such a result is an indication for repeat biopsy, usually within 3-6 months, sometimes sooner, because the risk of malignancy is not quite small and it is rated for a few percent.
- Lewiński A, Adamczewski Z: Decision making for surgery in the suspect thyroid nodule. (Proper application of ultrasound (US) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) completed but do not replace coexisting worrying clinical signs and symptoms). Thyroid Intern 2013, 1: 3–18.Google Scholar
- Moon WJ, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim DW, Kim EK, Kim JY, et al.: Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2011,12(1):1–14.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM: Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009,19(11):1167–1214.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adamczewski Z, Lewiński A: Proposed algorithm for management of patients with thyroid nodules/focal lesions, based on ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB); our own experience. Thyroid Res 2013, 6: 6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK, Kim MJ: A taller-than-wide shape in thyroid nodules in transverse and longitudinal ultrasonographic planes and the prediction of malignancy. Thyroid 2011,21(11):1249–1253.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alexander EK, Marqusee E, Orcutt J, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Cibas ES, Atri A: Thyroid nodule shape and prediction of malignancy. Thyroid 2004,14(11):953–958.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cibas ES, Ali SZ: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2009,19(11):1159–1165.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nou E, Kwong N, Alexander LK, Cibas ES, Marqusee E, Alexander EK: Determination of the optimal time interval for repeat evaluation after a benign thyroid nodule aspiration. Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014,99(2):510–516.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi YJ, Baek JH, Ha EJ, Lim HK, Lee JH, Kim JK, Song DE, Shong YK, Hong SJ: Differences in risk of malignancy and management recommendations in subcategories of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance: the role of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy. Thyroid 2014,24(3):494–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.