Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Solitary and multiple thyroid nodules as predictors of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thyroid Research volume 15, Article number: 22 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The debate on whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of thyroid cancer between the patients with Solitary thyroid Nodule (STN) and Multinodular Goiter (MNG) has been constantly present for the last few decades. With newer studies yielding mixed results, it was imperative to systematically compile all available literature on the topic.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials registry, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched for article retrieval. No filter was applied in terms of time, study design, language or country of publication. Rigorous screening as per PRISMA guidelines was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers in order to identify the articles that were most relevant to the topic.

Results

Twenty-two studies spanning from 1992 to 2018 were included in this analysis and encompassed 50,321 patients, 44.2% of which belonged to the STN subgroup and 55.37% to the MNG subgroup. MNG was found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.61–0.96) when compared with STN. Papillary carcinoma was the most frequently occurring carcinoma across both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinomas. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of the two most commonly employed diagnostic tools i.e. surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), however it yielded nonsignificant results, indicating a comparable usefulness of the two. Another subgroup analysis run on the basis of the presumed iodine status of the participants also yielded nonsignificant results.

Conclusion

There is a higher incidence of thyroid cancer among patients of STN, however, given the low quality of existing evidence on the topic, it is crucial to conduct larger studies that can establish association with a greater precision.

Introduction

Thyroid nodules are discrete lesions of the thyroid parenchyma with a comparatively low yet significant potential to develop malignancy. They are a common clinical finding, usually encountered incidentally [1], with prevalence ranging from 2 to 6% for clinically palpable nodules and 19 to 35% for ultrasonographically detected nodules [2]. The incidence is even higher on surgery or autopsy [2] .

The risk of malignancy among thyroid nodules has been estimated to range from 7 to 15% [3], high enough to warrant appropriate diagnostic means where carcinoma suspicion is present. Various clinical practice elements are known to predict the risk of malignancy. Female gender and radiation exposure seem to increase the probability of developing cancerous nodules [4]. Although older literature suggested a bimodal distribution of the risk of progression to carcinoma i.e. both young and old ages being associated with a higher risk of progression to carcinoma [5,6,7], newer literature suggests a decreasing general malignancy rate of thyroid nodules with advancing age [8, 9]. Recent advances in the understanding of thyroid nodules also point to their location as an independent predictor of malignancy risk, with mid-lobar, upper pole and lateral nodules carrying the highest likelihood of progression to carcinoma [10, 11]. It is also to be noted that cold nodules are at a much greater risk of developing malignancy as compared to hot nodules [12].

The term goiter refers to an abnormal growth or increase in size of the thyroid gland which may result from a single nodule or multiple nodules. Multinodular Goiter (MNG) has historically been considered a benign condition with a low risk of malignancy, however, this idea has been called into question after numerous studies have reported an incidence of carcinoma in MNG approaching that of a Single Thyroid Nodule (STN) [13,14,15,16], and at times even exceeding it [17]. Contradictory results from various studies exploring comparative risk of carcinoma in STN and MNG merit the conduction of a meta-analysis to adequately answer this question. As the risk of malignancy dictates diagnostic evaluation and management of thyroid nodules, the assessment of carcinoma risk holds significant clinical value. The only previous meta-analysis addressing this research question was published in 2013 [18], however, that too was limited by a smaller sample size and some statistical errors. It also excluded studies pertaining to important demographics such as children, and thus lacks a comprehensive picture that this meta-analysis promises.

Material and methods

This systematic review conforms to the guidelines elucidated in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [19] and has been registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (CRD42021284103).

Eligibility criteria

Types of studies

The study designs eligible for inclusion in our systematic review were observational studies (cross sectional, cohort, case–control) and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). However, we did not find RCT evidence catering to our topic. No language or location restrictions were applied. Databases were searched from conception to the present and non-English articles were translated to extract the pertinent information.

Types of participants

Studies which reported patients having diagnoses of MNG or STN through either fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAC) or histopathologically via surgical intervention were included.

Studies in which cancer diagnosis was made clinically, ultrasound alone, or those reporting cancer prevalence in patients with toxic (hot) nodules were excluded.

Types of comparisons

In our analysis, we compared the risk of thyroid cancer following MNG and STN with each other.

Types of outcomes

Our primary outcome was the prevalence of thyroid cancer among patients with MNG and STN.

Data sources and search strategy

We searched the following sources from inception to August 2021.

  • • Electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Science Direct.

  • • International Trial Registers: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov.

  • • Grey Literature sources: Google Scholar, Grey Literature Report and Virtual Healthy Library.

A combination of keywords and Mesh terms like “Multinodular goiter”, “Goiter, Nodular’’, “Thyroid Neoplasms” was used to search the databases. The complete search strategy of MEDLINE is provided in the supplementary file. The same search strategy was followed for the other databases. No filter of language, time and study design was used in order to retrieve the maximum literature. We also manually sieved the reference lists of retrieved articles and previous reviews to identify any missed studies, and contacted authors of the respective articles for any missing information vital to our review (Additional file 1).

Study selection and data extraction

All the literature search results were uploaded to Mendeley, and after de-duplication of articles, two reviewers independently performed screening on the basis of title and abstracts. Full text screening was done for the remaining articles and only those studies that met the predefined eligibility criteria were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the following data items from each study: type of study design, country where the study was performed, sample size of the study, total number of patients, age, sex, type of nodular goiter (MNG vs STN), length of follow up, prevalence of thyroid cancer, diagnosis of cancer (through surgery or FNAC), type of thyroid cancer, indication for surgery, family history of thyroid cancer, history of radiation exposure, and histopathology results. Any disagreement between the two reviewers was resolved through mutual discussion. A PRISMA flowchart is constructed to illustrate the study selection process.

Risk of bias in individual studies

Methodological quality of our included studies was assessed by two authors independently using Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies [20]. Studies were allocated stars on the basis of three perspectives: the selection of the study groups; the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of outcome of interest. A modified NOS scale was used for evaluating the quality of shortlisted cross-sectional studies. A third reviewer resolved any conflict that arose between the two reviewers regarding quality assessment.

Assessment of heterogeneity

We assessed heterogeneity among the studies included in our analysis using the Chi-square test. Values were interpreted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Sect. 10.10 [21]. Significance level was set at p value less than 0.10. Inconsistency was quantified using the I2 index. I2 > 50 percent constitutes a major inconsistency.

Assessment of reporting biases

Our meta-analysis consisted of more than 10 studies, so we constructed a funnel plot and subjected it to visual inspection to assess the presence of reporting bias. However, asymmetry can also be due to some other causes like true heterogeneity or presence of publication bias.

Statistical analysis

We performed meta-analyses using Review Manager (RevMan) (version 5.4. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). We used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model for conducting our meta-analysis. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with MNG was compared to the prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with STN. Pooled odds ratio with 95 percent confidence interval was calculated.

Additional analyses

We aimed to perform subgroup analyses based on the type of diagnostic method (surgery vs FNAC), history of thyroid cancer in family, history of radiation exposure and iodine status of the locale where the study was conducted. WHO data on iodine status of different locales worldwide was used to run this subgroup analysis [22] .

Confidence in cumulative evidence

The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) assessment tool [23]. The GRADE approach characterizes the quality of evidence in one of the four grades: high (true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect), moderate (true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different), low (true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect), and very low (true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect). Quality of evidence of our pooled estimate was rated down for limitations in study design or execution (risk of bias), inconsistency of results, indirectness of evidence, imprecision, and publication bias (Additional file 2).

Results

Study selection

We identified 3485 records through a comprehensive database search. After removal of duplicates (n = 10), 3475 records were screened on the basis of titles and abstracts. 3343 records were excluded through screening of title and abstract according to the eligibility criteria. 13 records were excluded as their full texts could not be retrieved. The remaining 119 articles were assessed for full text eligibility. 89 studies were found to be irrelevant, and were thus excluded. 8 articles were excluded because they used diagnostic criteria other than FNAC and surgery. The remaining 22 studies were included in this systematic review (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA Flow Diagram

Full size image

Study and patient characteristics

We included 22 studies spanning from 1992 to 2018 in our meta-analysis after extensive literature review [3, 12, 15, 16, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. 50,321 patients were included in the study. 22,352/50321 (44.42%) patients were enrolled in the STN sub-group and 27,864/50321(55.37%) patients in the MNG group. Most common cancer type was found to be papillary thyroid cancer, followed by follicular and medullary thyroid cancer. Nearly half of the studies subjected to meta-analysis used surgical intervention for diagnostic purposes and the rest used FNAC. Thyroidectomy was performed in the majority of the studies. Highest number of included studies from a single country (6/22) were from Italian demography followed by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and USA (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 Characteristics of Included Studies
Full size table
Table 2 Diagnostic Findings of Included Studies
Full size table

Quality assessment

Newcastle Ottowa Scale (NOS) was used to assess risk of bias in 13 cohort studies. 4/13 (30.8%) were prospective cohorts and 9/13 (69.2%) studies were retrospective cohorts. Out of 13 included cohort studies, 2/13(15.4%) had a low risk of bias and 11/13 (84.6%) had moderate risk. 11/13(84.6%) cohort studies didn’t assess comparability which contributed to an increased risk of bias. We used modified NOS to find out the risk of bias in 9 cross-sectional studies included in our meta-analysis. 3/10 (30%) cross-sectional studies reported low risk of bias and 7/10 (30%) had moderate risk. Only 3 cross-sectional studies performed comparability analysis. All included studies had representative samples, ascertainment of exposure and negligible non-respondent numbers (Additional file 3).

Risk of thyroid cancer in patients with Multinodular Goiter (MNG) vs Solitary Thyroid Nodule (STN)

We constructed a forest plot using the random effect model for meta-analysis. The risk of thyroid cancer was found to be significantly lower in MNG as compared to STN. Summary OR value was calculated to be 0.76 (CI:0.61–0.96), with significant inconsistency across studies [I2 = 76%] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot for risk of thyroid cancer in patients with Multinodular Goiter (MNG) vs. Solitary Thyroid Nodule (STN)

Full size image

Subgroup analyses

We performed subgroup analyses on the basis of diagnostic method and the iodine status in the locale to explore the causes of heterogeneity. 11/22 (50%) of our included studies used surgical resection as the diagnostic method while the other 11/22 (50%) diagnosed thyroid cancer via FNAC. On running the subgroup analysis, no significant differences between the two groups were observed (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Subgroup analysis on the basis of diagnostic methods

Full size image

Similarly, subgroup analysis on the basis of iodine status in the locale reported an insignificant difference between the two groups. Insufficient data was available to perform subgroup analysis on the basis of history of thyroid cancer in the family and history of radiation exposure (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Subgroup analysis on the basis of iodine status in the locale

Full size image

Assessment of reporting bias

A funnel plot for these 22 studies was subjected to visual inspection. Minor asymmetry was observed which confirmed insignificant publication bias (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Funnel plot for assessment of reporting bias

Full size image

Discussion

Both solitary thyroid nodules (STN) and multinodular goiter (MNG) usually present with a single nodule on palpation because the dominant nodule in MNG obscures the detection of other smaller nodules [42, 43]. A more substantial problem, however, arises when the results of cytological evaluation are indeterminate, and physicians are left withsurgery as the only option to definitively diagnose any malignancy. However, given that surgical evaluation for all cases of indeterminate thyroid nodules is neither clinically possible nor recommended, it is imperative to establish variables such as nodularity as risk factors for malignancy in order to better clinically assess individual patient risk for cancer [44]. It has been estimated that if surgery is performed for all indeterminate cases of FNAC, thyroid cancer will be found in only 10–40% of the cases[45], making the rest of the surgeries needless and futile. It is therefore essential to preemptively predict the risk of carcinoma in patients based on their clinical characteristics and examination findings, particularly nodularity. This will help formulate standard guidelines that can aid clinical decision making and management.

Our analysis corroborated the previously held view that single thyroid nodules are associated with a higher risk of thyroid carcinoma than multinodular goiter [18], and hence can be considered an independent risk factor to be used for carcinoma risk stratification. The purpose of thyroid nodule evaluation, therefore, is to identify both, nodules that may potentially be malignant and toxic nodules which are known to carry a lower risk of malignancy [46]. Such risk stratification allows to avoid histological evaluation, which is both needless and invasive, in cases of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

However, given the emerging evidence of equal or even greater carcinoma risk in MNG in some of the more recent studies [12, 16, 47], our findings can be attributed to several factors or limitations. Firstly, it has been estimated that 23% of clinically diagnosed solitary nodules are in fact dominant nodules within MNG [48], which if accounted for, would substantially increase not only the incidence of MNG, but also the attributed risk of thyroid carcinoma in MNG. The detection of thyroid carcinoma has increased with the development of better diagnostic tools [49], therefore, the incidence of carcinoma in MNG is expected to rise proportionally.

Moreover, conventionally only the dominant nodule has been biopsied in an MNG until the recent updates in guidelines, imposing a limitation on this study and any such meta-analysis carried out in the future. Frates et al. found that biopsying only the largest nodule carries with it the risk of missing a thyroid carcinoma by 15% [15]. In effect, although the dominant nodule in MNG carries a comparatively greater risk of progression to thyroid carcinoma [50], the rest of the nodules carry enough risk to be separately treated as solitary nodules on their own. Evidence also increasingly suggests that although cancer risk per nodule decreases with multinodular goiter, the cumulative risk when adjusted for the number of nodules equals that of a solitary nodule [51].

Unquestionably, the most important finding in this regard however, comes from Kaliszewski et al. [28]. FNAC was found to be three times more likely to give false negatives in the setting of MNG compared to STN, owing primarily to biopsy of only a specific nodule in MNG or collection of nondiagnostic samples. This is part of the reason why MNG is associated with higher reoperation rates than STN [28]. Given that FNAC is the tool most commonly employed for diagnosis of malignancy, this becomes an important confounding factor contributing to a lower than expected incidence of cancer in MNG.

A subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of diagnostic methods in order to compare histological diagnosis (surgery) with cytological diagnosis (FNAC). Although surgery has long been considered the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy in the thyroid, our results found no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the two. However, a significantly higher incidence of nodules on autopsy [52] poses a conundrum as visualization of a higher number of nodules would automatically expand the likelihood of a carcinoma diagnosis in surgery. Therefore, the insignificance of results were likely due to FNAC being carried out on only those nodules that have already been found to have malignant characteristics by ultrasound, a phenomenon thus termed ‘FNAC enrichment’.

Moreover, another subgroup analysis based on the iodine intake status of the participants also yielded statistically nonsignificant results, indicating that iodine intake had a minimal effect on progression to carcinoma. This differs from the previous meta-analysis which suggests that a difference in cancer risk between MNG and STN in different populations may stem from iodine intake difference at different locations [18].

Although further studies, particularly prospective, are crucial in establishing nodularity as a reliable predictor of malignancy, it is imperative to note the implications of this meta-analysis on existing understanding of thyroid nodules, especially the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), a parallel system of malignancy risk stratification that relies entirely on ultrasonographic features [53] . Patients with a lower malignancy risk determined clinically by physicians based on existing evidence on nodularity, may only be required to undergo ultrasonography, thus minimizing the need for invasive procedures such as FNAC or surgery, while also improving accuracy and sensitivity. This may even render nodularity only of an auxiliary importance in the prediction of malignancy risk.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study lie in the extensive literature search, the inclusion of all demographics including children that had been excluded in previous literature, rigorous quality assessment and minimal reporting bias. Given the scarcity of literature on the topic, this meta-analysis not only presents the largest pooling of data on the subject till date but also points out the gaps in existing literature.

Limitations of this meta-analysis arise primarily from the limited prospective data to dictate therapy. Most of the studies on the topic are observational studies, and hence are ill equipped to establish correlation. Moreover, most of the included studies are retrospective which is a major source of potential selection bias i.e. solitary nodules are more likely to be submitted for FNAC than MNG. This may further contaminate the results in favor of cancer risk in solitary nodules. Secondly, important demographic data such as age and gender as well as a distinction between incidental and non-incidental discovery of microcarcinomas were inconsistently reported, hindering any attempt to run a subgroup analysis on their basis and establishing a trend. Lastly, some of the studies did not describe any inclusion or exclusion criteria and may have followed selection criteria slightly differing from this review, thus polluting the overall sample.

Conclusions

Solitary thyroid nodules were found to carry a greater risk of thyroid carcinoma compared to multinodular goiter, however, the validity and strength of this association are questionable owing to the low quality of existing literature on the topic.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

References

  1. Pemayun TGD. Current Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules. Acta Med Indones. 2016;48(3):11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dean DS, Gharib H. Epidemiology of thyroid nodules. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22(6):901–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajarma KY, Al-Faouri AF, Al Ruhaibeh MK, Almbaidien FA, Nserat RT, Al-Shawabkeh AO, et al. The risk of thyroid carcinoma in multinodular goiter compared to solitary thyroid nodules: A retrospective analysis of 600 patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2020;76(1):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Y, Su L, Xiao H. Review of factors related to the thyroid cancer epidemic. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;7(2017): e5308635.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wasikowa R, Iwanicka Z, Zak T, Lukieńczuk T, Sawicz-Birkowska K. Nodular goiter and thyroid carcinoma in children and adolescents in a moderate endemic area (lower Silesia-Sudeten endemia) in the last twelve years. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. 1999;12(5):645–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlinkert RT, Heerden JAV, Goellner JR, Gharib H, Smith SL, Rosales RF, et al. Factors that predict malignant thyroid lesions when fine-needle aspiration is “suspicious for follicular neoplasm.” Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72(10):913–6.

  7. Baloch ZW, Fleisher S, LiVolsi VA, Gupta PK. Diagnosis of “follicular neoplasm”: a gray zone in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;26(1):41–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grani G, Brenta G, Trimboli P, Falcone R, Ramundo V, Maranghi M, et al. Sonographic risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules as rule-out tests in older adults. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Fermo F, Sforza N, Rosmarin M, MorosanAllo Y, Parisi C, Santamaria J, et al. Comparison of different systems of ultrasound (US) risk stratification for malignancy in elderly patients with thyroid nodules. Real world experience Endocrine. 2020;69(2):331–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang F, Russell YX, Guber HA. Transverse and Longitudinal Ultrasound Location of Thyroid Nodules and Risk of Thyroid Cancer. Endocr Pract Off J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2021;27(7):682–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramundo V, Lamartina L, Falcone R, Ciotti L, Lomonaco C, Biffoni M, et al. Is thyroid nodule location associated with malignancy risk? Ultrason (Seoul, Korea). 2019;38(3):231–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Belfiore A, La Rosa GL, La Porta GA, Giuffrida D, Milazzo G, Lupo L, et al. Cancer risk in patients with cold thyroid nodules: relevance of iodine intake, sex, age, and multinodularity. Am J Med. 1992;93(4):363–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandolfi PP, Frisina A, Raffa M, Renda F, Rocchetti O, Ruggeri C, et al. The incidence of thyroid carcinoma in multinodular goiter: retrospective analysis. Acta Bio-Medica Atenei Parm. 2004;75(2):114–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tollin SR, Mery GM, Jelveh N, Fallon EF, Mikhail M, Blumenfeld W, et al. The use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy under ultrasound guidance to assess the risk of malignancy in patients with a multinodular goiter. Thyroid. 2000;10(3):235–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Kunreuther E, Contreras M, Cibas ES, et al. Prevalence and distribution of carcinoma in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules on sonography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(9):3411–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Deandrea M, Mormile A, Veglio M, Motta M, Pellerito R, Gallone G, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: comparison between thyroid palpation and ultrasonography. Endocr Pract. 2002;8(4):282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Erbil Y, Barbaros U, Salmaslioglu A, Mete O, Issever H, Ozarmagan S, et al. Effect of thyroid gland volume in preoperative detection of suspected malignant thyroid nodules in a multinodular goiter. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960. 2008;143(6):558–63 discussion 563.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brito JP, Yarur AJ, Prokop LJ, McIver B, Murad MH, Montori VM. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in multinodular goiter versus single nodule: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc. 2013;23(4):449–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. PRISMA.  Available from: http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAstatement/checklist.aspx. [Cited 11 Feb 2022].

  20. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute . Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. [Cited 11 Feb 2022].

  21. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current. [Cited 11 Feb 2022].

  22. World Health Organization. Iodine status worldwide : WHO Global Database on Iodine Deficiency [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2004 . Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43010. [Cited 11 Feb 2022].

  23. GRADE handbook. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html#h.svwngs6pm0f2.

  24. Abu-Eshy SA, Khan AR, Khan GM, al-Humaidi MA, al-Shehri MY, Malatani TS. Thyroid malignancy in multinodular goitre and solitary nodule. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1995;40(5):310–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dirikoç A, Fakı S, Başer H, Özdemir D, Aydın C, Ersoy R, et al. Thyroid malignancy risk in different clinical thyroid diseases. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(5):1509–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Edino ST, Mohammed AZ, Ochicha O, Malami SA, Yakubu AA. Thyroid cancers in nodular goiters in Kano. Nigeria Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13(3):298–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Franklyn JA, Daykin J, Young J, Oates GD, Sheppard MC. Fine needle aspiration cytology in diffuse or multinodular goitre compared with solitary thyroid nodules. BMJ. 1993;307(6898):240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaliszewski K, Diakowska D, Wojtczak B, Strutyńska-Karpińska M, Domosławski P, Sutkowski K, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy as a preoperative procedure in patients with malignancy in solitary and multiple thyroid nodules. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146883.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Khairy GA, Guraya SY. Primary care evaluation of thyroid disease: Which clinical group needs urgent surgical referral? Bahrain Med Bull. 2004;1(26):143–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marqusee E, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Larsen PR, Cibas ES, et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography in the management of nodular thyroid disease. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(9):696–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mateša N, Tabain I, Kusić Z. The Risk of Thyroid Malignancy in Patients with Solitary Thyroid Nodule Versus Patients with Multinodular Goiter. Acta Clin Croat. 2005;44(1):7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miccoli P, Minuto MN, Galleri D, D’Agostino Jacopo, Basolo F, Antonangeli L, et al. Incidental thyroid carcinoma in a large series of consecutive patients operated on for benign thyroid disease. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(3):123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nóbrega LHC, Paiva FJP, Nóbrega MLC, Mello LEB, Fonseca HAF, Costa SO, et al. Predicting malignant involvement in a thyroid nodule: role of ultrasonography. Endocr Pract. 2007;13(3):219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Papendieck P, Gruñeiro-Papendieck L, Venara M, Acha O, Cozzani H, Mateos F, et al. Differentiated thyroid cancer in children: prevalence and predictors in a large cohort with thyroid nodules followed prospectively. J Pediatr. 2015;167(1):199–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Provenzale MA, Fiore E, Ugolini C, Torregrossa L, Morganti R, Molinaro E, et al. ‘Incidental’ and ‘non-incidental’ thyroid papillary microcarcinomas are two different entities. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(6):813–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Taccogna S, Nardi F, et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):1941–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rago T, Fiore E, Scutari M, Santini F, Coscio GD, Romani R, et al. Male sex, single nodularity, and young age are associated with the risk of finding a papillary thyroid cancer on fine-needle aspiration cytology in a large series of patients with nodular thyroid disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162(4):763–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ríos A, Rodríguez JM, Torregrosa NM, Torregrosa B, Cepero A, Abellán MD, et al. Evaluation of the thyroid nodule with high-resolution ultrasonography and elastography without fine needle aspiration biopsy. Med Clin (Barc). 2018;151(3):89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sachmechi I, Miller E, Varatharajah R, Chernys A, Carroll Z, Kissin E, et al. Thyroid carcinoma in single cold nodules and in cold nodules of multinodular goiters. Endocr Pract. 2000;6(1):5–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sippel RS, Elaraj DM, Khanafshar E, Kebebew E, Duh QY, Clark OH. Does the presence of additional thyroid nodules on ultrasound alter the risk of malignancy in patients with a follicular neoplasm of the thyroid? Surgery. 2007;142(6):851-857.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Taneri F, Kurukahvecioglu O, Ege B, Yilmaz U, Tekin E, Cifter C, et al. Prospective analysis of 518 cases with thyroidectomy in Turkey. Endocr Regul. 2005;39(3):85–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thyroid Cancer. EndocrineWeb. Available from: https://www.endocrineweb.com/conditions/thyroid-cancer/thyroid-cancer. [Cited 15 Oct 2021].

  43. Wong R, Farrell SG, Grossmann M. Thyroid nodules: diagnosis and management. Med J Aust. 2018;209(2):92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Trimboli P, Ferrarazzo G, Cappelli C, Piccardo A, Castellana M, Barizzi J. Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate FNAC According to the Italian Classification System: Prevalence, Rate of Operation, and Impact on Risk of Malignancy. An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Endocr Pathol [Internet]. 2022 Aug 31 [cited 2022 Oct 2]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09729-x

  45. Popoveniuc G, Jonklaas J. Thyroid Nodules. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96(2):329–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lau LW, Ghaznavi S, Frolkis AD, Stephenson A, Robertson HL, Rabi DM, et al. Malignancy risk of hyperfunctioning thyroid nodules compared with non-toxic nodules: systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thyroid Res. 2021;14(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Luo J, McManus C, Chen H, Sippel RS. Are There Predictors of Malignancy in Patients with Multinodular Goiter?1. J Surg Res. 2012;174(2):207–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Welker MJ, Orlov D. Thyroid Nodules. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(3):559–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kitahara CM, Sosa JA. The changing incidence of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(11):646–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Day TA, Chu A, Hoang KG. Multinodular goiter. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003;36(1):35–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cheng SP, Liu CL, Tzen CY, Yang TL, Jeng KS, Liu TP, et al. Characteristics of well-differentiated thyroid cancer associated with multinodular goiter. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(5):729–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zamora EA, Khare S, Cassaro S. Thyroid Nodule. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535422/. [Cited 15 Oct 2021].

  53. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

    Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Muhammad Ehsan, Haseeba Javed, Muhammad Zain Ameer, Aleenah Mohsin & Ahmad Nawaz

  2. Clinical Research Fellow, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Muhammad Aemaz Ur Rehman & Fatima Ameer

  3. Department of Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

    Zunaira Amjad

  4. Department of Medicine, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

    Fatima Ameer

Authors
  1. Aqeeb Ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Ehsan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haseeba Javed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Zain Ameer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aleenah Mohsin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Aemaz Ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ahmad Nawaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zunaira Amjad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fatima Ameer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AUR and MZA conceived the idea and ME along with FA established a search strategy. HJ, AM and AN retrieved the articles and screened them for relevance. ZA and MZA assisted with full text screening. AN and MAR then ran quality assessment on the selected articles. Data was extracted by AUR, MZA and AM. ZA and FA proofread the extracted data. ME and HJ then ran the meta-analysis. AUR and ME then worked on the write up of the article, which was provided with critical revisions by MAR and AM. HJ is the corresponding author for this paper as well. All authors read and approved the final version of this article. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haseeba Javed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Search Strategy.

Additional file 2:

GRADE. We used the GRADE assessment tool to assess the quality of evidence. Studies being observational in nature, inconsistency and serious risk of bias contributed to decreased quality.

Additional file 3.

Critical Appraisal of Cohort studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rehman, A.U., Ehsan, M., Javed, H. et al. Solitary and multiple thyroid nodules as predictors of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid Res 15, 22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6

Keywords

  • Thyroid nodule
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Thyroid carcinoma
  • Single thyroid nodule
  • Single nodule
  • Multinodular goiter
  • Nodular goiter

Thyroid Research

ISSN: 1756-6614